The rig
It takes more to compare a pair of smartphones than holding one in each h shooting out into the void. I wanted this to be an accurate portrayal of how these two devices compared against each other in the real world, so I enlisted the help of one of our .tv directors to build a contraption that would hold each phone steady to capture the same shot, with the shutters firing at the same time. The “rig,” as we’ve so plainly dubbed it, consists of one heavy-duty selfie stick two metal bike clamps with adjustable smartphone holsters. then positioned both the ione 6S Galaxy S7 at equal length used two Bluetooth controllers to trigger the shutters.
The contenders
The Samsung Galaxy S7 comes equipped with a rear-facing 12-megapixel camera. It features Dual xel technology, which is fancy lingo for the technology used inside most Canon DSs. This means the camera sensor inside the GS7 has two photodiodes in every pixel of the camera sensor, which allows every single pixel to be a phase-detection autofocus point. It also features optical image stabilization. The ione 6S also has a 12-megapixel rear-facing camera, with a technology Apple calls Focus xels. Unlike the GS7, the 6S’s phase-detection auto focus only locks in on a few select pixels. The 6S also has a smaller aperture than the Galaxy S7 (f/2.2, compared to f/1.7), which lets in less light. The 6S GS7 both shoot with automatic HDR enabled by default, but I thought it would be best if we focused specifically on testing each phone’s camera capabilities without this feature enabled. I wanted this to be an exercise in pure pointing shooting, without any extra software tricks.
Shooting outside
en I first started this experiment, I favored the photos taken with the Galaxy S7. They were brighter, clearer, more vibrant on screen than the ione 6S’s. They also required the least amount of editing with an app like Snapseed or VSCO Cam before being exported. But when I sat down to compare the photos with my videographer, -, who does his own professional shooting on the weekends, we noticed that Samsung is overly processing each photo. Take this photo under the freeway, for instance. You’ll notice that the Galaxy S7 increases the contrast in the scene. As a result, the sky is overexposed, the scene under the bridge is too dark. It’s fine for sharing online, but this would become an issue if you were planning to take this photo into the editing room. The brighter sky means less detail to work with in a post-processing desktop application like ghtroom. The ione 6S, on the other h, has a tendency of producing pictures that appear flat muted. Its photos were the type that I would probably run through a few filters before posting to Instagram. But despite that, the 6S actually offered more dynamic range than the Galaxy S7 precisely because it doesn’t overly process. As a EG, it’s the better picture to take to the computer or an editing application. The ione 6S is also the winner when it comes to color accuracy, which is incidentally what contributes to its dull-looking photos. ok at the photo of a red Mini Cooper shot outside in daylight. The Galaxy S7’s end result appears more magenta on the hood of the car because of the reflection of the blue sky from above. The ione 6S’s end result shows that the hood is a firetruck red, which is the color I witnessed with my own eye. Samsung is notorious for over-sharpening its photos, too, it’s singing the same song with the Galaxy S7. This isn’t particularly debilitating to the overall look of the photo, but it does introduce extra artifacts speckles. On the plus side, it ensures the end result looks shareable from the get-go.
Shooting indoors
Humans spend about 90 percent of their days indoors, which means that a majority of the time you’re shooting with your smartphone, you’re likely somewhere inside, away from natural light. If your primary shooter is the Galaxy S7, you’re in good company. Samsung’s flagship shoots clearer photos in low-light environments compared to the ione 6S due in part to its wider f/1.7 aperture, compared to the 6S’s f/2.2. But there were still a few times that the GS7 missed the mark because of its excessive processing. First things first, let’s explore how each phone hles indoor shots. The ione 6S’s version of this cheesy bar sign in the darkest corner of my living room looks almost lifeless, as if there’s a very thin layer of dust blanketing the wine cabinet the metal sign. The Galaxy S7’s end result is brighter more vivid, though there’s also noticeable saturation of the pinks blue hues throughout the photo. Regardless, Samsung’s penchant for over-sharpening actually puts at an advantage in this particular situation: if you zoom into the GS7’s photo, it’s sharpened enough that you can actually read Bar s Compadres on the glass diorama. A few times while shooting indoors, the ione 6S would lock on an subject then lose focus after tapping the shutter button. This happened when I shot the above photo, thus resulting in a blurry narwhal figurine with wrapping that’s hard to parse. The GS7’s result offers better overall toning, though it could still use a bit of a “punch” in editing before it goes to social media. The Galaxy S7 struggled with the low-light portrait photo. In an attempt to overcompensate for the dark environment, the GS7 brightened everything up, including the fireplace in the background my face. That kind of automatic editing left me looking blue-hued pale, you can hardly see that I’m wearing makeup. I prefer the ione 6S’s portrait photo instead, where you can actually see the color of my blush.
Up close personal
You never know when you’re going to want to take an close-up shot of your food, your figurines, or an attractive lavender bush on your walk home. The Galaxy S7 is especially capable of hling the focus on these types of shots, it’s particularly good at preserving detail up close. The Galaxy S7 soared in the macro test, which I shot with the camera rig so that both phones were equidistant. The Galaxy S7’s depiction of the cat figurine pictured above appears clearer more detailed, whereas the ione’s is flatter, with less detail around the cat’s eyes. The 6S also had trouble focusing on the subject, thus resulting in a blurry cat face. At least the ione 6S managed to pull off a depth of field shot, though the extra lighting probably helped it lock its focus. Still, the Galaxy S7’s penchant for sharpening things made it so that you can actually see veins on the leaf in the foreground. The ione 6S certainly struggled in this test. In this photo above of the fountain spout, the ione 6S shot at half the speed half the ISO of the Galaxy S7. This resulted in a blurry stream. see the same result in this photo of a pigeon flying away (with a dumpster in the background—poor framing on my part). The GS7 shot at a higher shutter speed than the 6S, which managed to capture the bird’s flapping, while the 6S’s pigeon appears blurry against a similarly blurry background. The GS7 isn’t entirely excused, however, because if you zoom in, you’ll notice the halo effect around the bird’s body that’s a result of over-sharpening.
Shooting in the dark
th an aperture of f/1.7, the Galaxy S7 is already capable of taking in more light than the ione 6S’s f/2.2 lens. I took both phones into our pitch-black photo testing lab to show exactly how those numbers translate into photos. If you squint a bit, you can see the outline of an open computer case with the GS7’s photo, while the 6S barely managed to capture the two D lights. The metadata showed that the 6S shot at a higher shutter speed of 1/15 an ISO of 2000 to compensate for the lack of lighting, compared to the GS7’s longer shutter speed of 1/4 ISO 1250. Because the GS7 employs OIS, the shutter can stay open longer to capture more light. I then took some shots out in my backyard to see how the Galaxy S7 ione 6S each hle soft night lighting. The Galaxy S7 experienced some intense chromatic aberration around the string of lights. The worst part is that there’s not much editing I can do to this photo to try fix it, either. You can see the difference between Apple Samsung’s white balance in low-light environments, too. In the photo above, the 6S skews red-orange, while the S7 gravitates more towards yellow-green. I prefer the ione’s coloring, though there’s a ton of noise in both photos that would make it difficult to edit either one. The Galaxy S7 picked up a lot more detail in the lower pot. Again, Samsung’s wide aperture sharpening seems to pay off in low light situations. I like that I can see the distinction in the texture of the teak patio furniture in the GS7’s result, though the coloring is a bit off, it’s more appealing to look at.
noramas
Back in the day, when I used an ione 4S as my daily driver for about six months, I remember being really impressed with the phone’s panoramic stitching abilities. I’m happy to report that the four generations later, the ione still does a great job stitching together panoramas. I took three panoramas in San Francisco’s SOMA neighborhood from our office’s rooftop terrace. The ione’s remains the champion. It’s clearer, you can see more detail. The Galaxy S7 locked on to the exposure of the buildings, severely overexposing the sky. I can see stitching errors in both photos, but I feel like Samsung’s penchant for getting in more detail more scenery is at a disadvantage here. It’s nice for your own personal memory making, but if I’m showing off a mountain side, I don’t want the panorama to be so big that I have to crop it. The Galaxy S7’s saving grace in this particular situation is that you can turn your panoramas into a shareable video, which should make posting to social media an easier venture.
Selfies
In keeping with our tradition of testing each smartphone’s selfie capabilities, I just had to compare these two 5-megapixel front-facing cameras. The ione 6S did not mirror my photo, like the Galaxy S7. It’s actually brighter, rather than focusing on how to contrast the background, it focused on capturing the details of my face. The Galaxy S7’s wider camera angle makes me look like I’m farther away, too, when all I did was strap each smartphone to the Gorillad shoot a selfie at arm’s length. The ione’s view is better for a solo selfie, but the Galaxy S7 makes it easier to fit your friend in frame with you. Vain photographers can at least appreciate the Galaxy S7’s wealth of customization options for the selfie, including the ability to soften or slim your face. But be forewarned that if you increase any of those filters to the highest strength, you’ll start to see some unnatural distortion, then you’ll look like a bad otoshop job.
Extra features
The ione 6S may preserve more dynamic range than the Galaxy S7, but it’s subpar in its feature set. Apple limits its users to six basic functions, including a e pse mode, Slow Motion video mode, an Instagram-ready square photo mode, a norama. Automatic HDR is also available, along with eight different colored image filters, but if you want anything else you’ll have to download an app for that. The Galaxy S7 is more versatile. There are ten different camera modes, including a Selective Focus option, which helps better fake the macro shot, as well as a video collage mode, live broadcasting mode, a gimmicky Virtual Shot mode, which makes neat 3D photo animations. (I’ve posted a few to Instagram.) The crown jewel of the Galaxy S7 is its o mode, however, which converts the smartphone into a manual camera of sorts. It’s not as robust as an actual DS, but if you find you don’t like the look of the overly saturated, overly sharpened photos that Samsung produces, you at least have the option to take matters into your own hs. at’s more: the Galaxy S7 lets you save RAimages, which retains way more information than a normal EG would.
Every phone has its thorns
Samsung’s claim that the Galaxy S7 has a better camera than the ione 6S is one side of the story. It’s true that the ione doesn’t produce photos that are as vibrant, but you can easily toss those pictures through an app to polish them up a bit before sharing them with the Internet. And like Apple, Samsung pushes its preferences on users by asking them to trust their image processing engine. The results are more vibrant colorful, but often overexposed overly-sharpened. Samsung’s saving grace in this fight is that it offers a manual mode with adjustable camera settings. ile no phone has a perfect camera, you want the phone that will produce the best-looking photo right out of the box. In that case, I’m entirely in favor of Samsung’s end results, even if they are a little over-processed at times. But you don’t have to resign yourself to that, either. If you don’t want Samsung to do what it does with your photos, you can choose to do something differently with the manual mode. Apple’s ione doesn’t offer that, though its photos offer enough dynamic range for anyone who gravitates towards the iOS platform likes a little edit-ability in their photos, it’s not the most versatile smartphone camera.
